Share this post
When you search for the best Kubernetes managed service providers, you want to know how each service handles cost, support quality, scale, and real integration demands.
This guide gives you the direct answer by comparing the seven leading Kubernetes managed service providers and showing which one fits your needs. You will see where each service shines, where it falls short, and how it supports real enterprise demands.
We’ll also cover how managed platforms compare to self-managed setups, as well as the factors to consider before choosing a managed service provider.
Red Hat OpenShift Platform Plus: Best for Full-Stack Kubernetes Governance
Red Hat OpenShift is an enterprise-grade Kubernetes platform tailored for hybrid and multicloud environments. Its Platform Plus edition combines Kubernetes, multicluster governance, strong security, and a scalable container registry to bring consistent DevSecOps capabilities across any infrastructure.
Key Features
- Multicluster governance: Uses Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management to let you control clusters from a single console
- Kubernetes-native security: Integrates Advanced Cluster Security for threat detection, compliance policies, and risk assessment
- Global container registry: Includes Red Hat Quay for secure, scalable image storage across your organization
- Integrated data services: Provides a built-in data foundation for persistent storage, resilience, and data governance.
Pricing
Where OpenShift Shines
- Strong enterprise governance: You apply consistent policies and access controls across clusters.
- Built-in DevSecOps: Security and compliance are native, not added later.
- Hybrid and cloud-native scale: You deploy and manage workloads across on-prem, cloud, and edge with one unified platform.
Where OpenShift Falls Short
- Complex cost structure: Licensing and core-based pricing drive up TCO for large or highly scaled environments.
- Heavy operations burden: You need skilled teams to manage upgrades, policies, and daily operations.
- Less flexibility outside Red Hat stack: It requires Red Hat ecosystem lock-in.
Source: Reddit
Pro tip: Portainer gives you a lighter, faster, vendor-agnostic way to manage your Kubernetes clusters, including those running on OpenShift infrastructure, without having to upsell to pricier options.
Customer Reviews
“It makes the complicated parts of Kubernetes simple.” Joseph S.
“The continuing and never-ending changing in subscriptions (CPU core count), and different products (OCP, Kubernetes engine, Virtualization, etc) can make it extremely hard to predict how its going to be prices when it's time to renew.” Verified G2 user
Who OpenShift is best for
- Large regulated enterprises need consistent security, compliance, and control across multiple clusters.
- Platform engineering teams: You manage diverse infrastructure and need a powerful, unified Kubernetes foundation.
- DevSecOps-driven companies: Security and governance must be embedded throughout your application lifecycle.
You can also explore OpenShift alternatives in our in-depth guide.
Mirantis Kubernetes Engine: Best for Teams that want a Secure Runtime
Mirantis Kubernetes Engine is a Kubernetes managed service provider built on the former Docker Enterprise stack. You get a hardened container runtime, Kubernetes lifecycle tooling, multi-cloud support, and long-term commercial support for Kubernetes.
Key Features
- Cluster lifecycle management: Upgrades and operates clusters across cloud, data centre, and edge with declarative workflows.
- Secure container runtime: You can run workloads on Mirantis Container Runtime with FIPS-compliant image execution for regulated environments.
- Edge optimized distribution: Deploys lightweight k0s clusters at the edge with full commercial support.
Pricing
Where MKE Shines
- Security and compliance: Provides a hardened runtime, FIPS-compliant images, image trust, and lifecycle controls suited for government and regulated industries.
- Integrated enterprise stack: Runs Kubernetes, registry, runtime, monitoring, and logging as a single platform instead of piecing together multiple vendors.
Where MKE Falls Short
- Heavy platform footprint: Managing Mirantis requires more technical expertise than lighter Kubernetes-managed service provider options.
Source: G2
- Higher licensing costs: Costs per node are higher than those of most vendor-neutral platforms, especially at scale.
- Less distribution flexibility: Dependence on Mirantis tooling and runtime components can limit portability when a neutral control plane is preferred.
{{article-pro-tip}}
Customer Review
Source: G2
Who MKE is best for
- Regulated industries: You run FIPS-compliant workloads and need strict governance.
- Ops-heavy teams: You prefer a full enterprise stack instead of a lightweight operational layer.
Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE): Best for High-Scale, Cloud-Native Workloads
GKE delivers a production-ready Kubernetes environment with automated operations, strong reliability, and deep integration with Google Cloud. It shines in large-scale orchestration, advanced autoscaling, and consistent performance. Its shortcomings include higher costs at scale and strong dependence on Google Cloud services.
Key Features
- Autopilot mode: Handles node provisioning and cluster ops for predictable efficiency.
- Vertical and horizontal autoscaling: Adjusts workloads based on demand.
- GKE security suite: Provides built-in policy controls and workload isolation.
- Global load balancing: Distributes traffic across regions for resilient performance.
Pricing
Customer Review
Source: Reddit
Nutanix Kubernetes Platform: Hybrid-Focused Kubernetes Managed Service Provider
Nutanix Kubernetes Platform extends the Nutanix stack into Kubernetes for hybrid and edge environments, but it still operates like a full-scale platform that requires strong Kubernetes skills.
It shines when aligning workloads with Nutanix infrastructure and distributed sites. Although users report installing friction, documentation gaps, and added engineering effort.
Key Features
- Hybrid and edge integration: Connects clusters to Nutanix infrastructure.
- Lifecycle tooling: Handles cluster deployment and upgrades.
- Ecosystem alignment: Best suited for existing Nutanix environments.
Pricing
Customer Review
Source: G2
{{article-cta}}
Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service: Large AWS-Centric Cloud Architectures
Amazon EKS delivers a stable, scalable control plane with deep AWS integration, strong security defaults, and support for EKS Fargate and Amazon EKS hybrid nodes. It’s a good option when workloads depend on AWS services and global availability, though costs rise at scale, and portability is limited outside the AWS ecosystem.
Source: G2
Key Features
- Managed control plane: Automated upgrades and high availability.
- EKS Fargate: Runs pods without managing EC2 nodes.
- Amazon EKS hybrid nodes: Extends clusters to on-prem environments.
Pricing
Customer Review
“Amazon EKS is an easy-to-use managed Kubernetes service. It comes with several features which make it easy for k8s admins to manage it efficiently and effectively. The AWS customer support is also very helpful when you need any assistance for the service.” Parth G.
Azure Kubernetes Service: Best for Teams Already Using Microsoft Azure
Azure AKS provides a streamlined Kubernetes control plane with strong identity integration, hybrid reach through Azure Stack HCI, and consistent governance via Azure Arc. It works for organisations already invested in Microsoft ecosystems and compliance needs.
Its shortcomings include regional reliability concerns, complex networking, and rising costs as clusters scale.
Source: G2
Key Features
- AKS automatic operations: Handles control plane upgrades and repairs.
- Azure Stack HCI support: Extends AKS to on-prem environments.
- Azure Arc integration: Centralises policy, identity, and cluster governance
Pricing
Managed vs Self-Managed Kubernetes: What’s the Difference?
Choosing between managed and self-managed Kubernetes factors down to how much control and operational responsibility you want. Managed Kubernetes offloads the control plane and maintenance tasks, while self-managed Kubernetes gives you full ownership of configuration.
Let’s see more differences!
Managed Kubernetes Services
Managed Kubernetes services such as GKE, EKS, and AKS run and maintain the control plane for you.
The provider manages upgrades, patches, availability, and essential infrastructure tasks. You focus on deploying workloads, setting policies, and configuring your Kubernetes environment without taking on the operational burden of managing cluster internals.
Self-Managed Kubernetes
Self-managed Kubernetes gives you full control over the platform but also full responsibility. Your team installs, scales, patches, monitors, and secures every part of the cluster.
This approach suits organisations that want deep customisation or strict control, but it requires more engineering effort than a managed Kubernetes service model.
Fully Managed Kubernetes Clusters Platform
Portainer is a unified platform for managing Kubernetes clusters across any environment, from on-prem data centers to cloud providers like OpenShift, MKE, Nutanix, GKE, EKS, AWS, and more. It gives enterprise teams a single, consistent way to operate mixed infrastructures while keeping the workflow simple, lightweight, and usable.
Most importantly, it avoids lock-in by acting as a universal container management platform that provides a unified control plane across multiple environments without forcing users into specific distributions. The platform helps you reduce setup time, misconfiguration issues, and standardize operations across mixed infrastructures.
Key Features
Universal Kubernetes Management
Portainer manages any CNCF-conformant Kubernetes distributions, including GKE, EKS, Red Hat OpenShift, and more. You also get native support for Talos clusters through the Sidero Omni integration, which streamlines provisioning and lifecycle tasks.
This flexibility gives you the freedom to scale Kubernetes without lock-in or a forced vendor path.
Self-Hosted and Built for Secure Environments
Portainer runs inside your infrastructure, not as a SaaS service. This feature makes it suitable for regulated environments, government teams, industrial networks, and any setup that needs strict boundaries or air-gapped operation. For example, security teams can maintain full control over traffic paths, identity, and access.
The design also works well for customers who rely on Kubernetes-managed platform services when they need operational support without losing infrastructure ownership.
Rapid Setup and Fast Time-to-Value
Portainer’s ease of setup is a reason why many teams choose it. This Kubernetes management platform installs quickly and removes the steep learning curve often linked to Kubernetes setup.
The UI makes cluster operations simple, allowing new engineers to onboard in minutes instead of weeks.
Lower Cost with Full Enterprise Capability
Portainer delivers enterprise-grade features at a fraction of the cost of traditional managed Kubernetes services.
Total cost assumption for container platform deployment using 150 production nodes
Many customers cut costs by more than half while gaining a cleaner interface and faster workflows. The pricing advantage becomes even clearer when compared with alternatives that require larger teams to operate.
Side note: You can use the Portainer calculator to estimate the cost of designing, deploying, and operating a production-ready Kubernetes platform.
Pricing
All plans include unified control across environments, built-in security, and ongoing support. The pricing also varies per selected number of nodes
Note: You can get an extended enterprise free trial with 15 nodes to test the platform on a larger environment for 45 days.
Where Portainer Shines
- Universal Kubernetes control: Gives teams a single, consistent UI to manage any Kubernetes environment. It can even provision new clusters directly from the dashboard, removing the friction of spinning up infrastructure across platforms.
- Self-hosted reliability and trust: Allows you to keep full control of your data, security boundaries, and operational workflows. This is something some managed Kubernetes platforms can’t guarantee.
- Enterprise-grade power at a lower cost: Portainer delivers the capabilities enterprise teams need. Think of governance, RBAC, simplified operations without the heavy enterprise price tag.
Where Portainer Falls Short
- Self-hosting required: Teams must manage their own infrastructure and upgrades.
- Some advanced features still need CLI: Niche Kubernetes operations may require native tools.
- Not a fully managed service: Portainer enhances the management of Kubernetes but does not replace a fully outsourced control plane.
Note: Portainer offers managed platform services for teams that want us to fully manage their Kubernetes clusters.
Customer Reviews
“Portainer’s UI is clean and intuitive, which saves a lot of time compared to manually managing Kubernetes through CLI. It’s easy to deploy, and we use it frequently for day-to-day container tasks. Setting up environments, managing stacks, and monitoring resource usage feels effortless. The role-based access control and team management features are also very handy in a collaborative setup.” Bharath
“Overall, Portainer is a great container management tool that works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm, and Azure.” Yuko H
Who Portainer is best for
- Enterprise teams: Ideal for enterprises that want a unified, low-overhead way to manage diverse Kubernetes environments.
- IT and DevOps engineers: Great for engineers who need a secure, self-hosted platform with fast setup and clear operational visibility
Book a demo to see why industry-leading enterprises choose Portainer as their first-choice Kubernetes management platform.
{{article-cta}}
